Home

January 8, 2006

In Alito Battle, Issues of Presidential Power Thrust to Forefront

by David G. Savage
Los Angeles Times

Twenty years ago, a Reagan administration lawyer proposed that when the president signed a bill passed by Congress, he should use the occasion to declare how he interpreted it.

"The president's understanding of the bill should be just as important as that of Congress," wrote Samuel A. Alito Jr. in a 1986 memo. Spelling out those thoughts "would increase the power of the executive to shape the law," he added.

ADVERTISEMENT

President Bush put that idea to work two weeks ago in a little-noticed statement that followed his signing of the muchcelebrated McCain amendment, which forbids cruel, inhumane or degrading treatment of prisoners here and abroad.

His words appeared to turn a legislative defeat into a White House victory. Bush said he would back the torture ban so long as it didn't conflict with his "constitutional authority" as commander in chief and his need to "protect the American people from further terrorist attacks."

Read the complete story (Some news sites require registration)

Related Headlines

November 19, 2009
In Mo. schools, ancient calendar at center of debate
Religion News Service
November 15, 2009
Clash of orthodoxies shows the faith-reason dichotomy
Deseret Morning News
November 13, 2009
Chicago mezuzah discrimination federal case revived
Chicago Sun-Times
November 11, 2009
Judge strikes down plate
The State
November 11, 2009
Disclaimer proposed for anti-abortion clinics
The Washington Post
Religious Landscape Survey

Email Newsletter

Stay informed with weekly updates from the Pew Forum.

See Newsletter Archive